The theory of evolution by natural selection is
on trial in the state of Kansas.
The Kansas State Board of Education will hear a plethora of arguments on both sides, evolutionist and creationist (or "intelligent design" as it is now known) to determine what will be taught to students in Kansas' public schools. As always, I have my own opinion on the matter.
For starters, I think everyone should know that evolution is not just a "theory." In scientific terms, a "theory" means something that has been tried and tested over and over and over again. What is known in colloquial terms as a "theory" is called a "hypothesis" in science. Other examples of theories in science include everything from Einstein's theory of relativity to less debatable topics like the theory of gravity.
That being said, I feel that both sides of this debate need to understand something. Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection does not account for how life actually
began, it only accounts for how life
evolved. Thus, it is very possible to be both a creationist and an evolutionist, simply by saying that the creator created life and evolution led it to its current state. It was for this same reason that in 2002 Pope John Paul II decreed that nothing in the theory of evolution contradicted biblical teachings, and that it was OK by him. (The current pope feels differently.)
But we shouldn't teach intelligent design in schools. First off, it has no scientific basis. You can make the argument that we should include it since we include teaching many other philosophical perspectives (like Aristotle for instance), but if you include one version of creationism, you must also include ALL creation stories, from the Iroquois to the Incas to the Chinese. Science is the only way we can decide what can and cannot be taught in a classroom setting. It may not be a perfect tool, but it is the best tool we have, and we should respect it.
In time, theories like evolution will be perfected and made into laws. Until then, it would create educational havoc to teach things in a science course without any scientific basis. If you want your child to be taught "intelligent design" (which if you ask me isn't so intelligent, but that's another discussion) then send your child to a private religious school. Until then, separation of church and state, as well as church and science.